Potential Republican Party Responses to King v. Burwell: A Conversation With Tevi Troy (May 28th)
www.thehealthcarepolicypodcast.com
Listen now (22 mins) | Listen Now Shortly before the Supreme Court recesses in early July the Court will rule on David King v. Sylvia Burwell, the case where the plaintiffs argue the Affordable Care Act only allows for tax credit subsidies via state-run exchanges or only those, as the ACA states, "established by the state." If the court rules in favor of the plaintiff an estimated 5 to 8 million newly insured will lose their coverage absent a subsidy because to date only 16 states plus the District of Columbia have set up state health insurance exchanges or marketplaces. If this is the Court's ruling how might the Republican-controlled Congress react? Regardless of the Court's decision the health care reform likely becomes a 2016 presidential campaign issue for the Republican party.
Potential Republican Party Responses to King v. Burwell: A Conversation With Tevi Troy (May 28th)
Potential Republican Party Responses to King…
Potential Republican Party Responses to King v. Burwell: A Conversation With Tevi Troy (May 28th)
Listen now (22 mins) | Listen Now Shortly before the Supreme Court recesses in early July the Court will rule on David King v. Sylvia Burwell, the case where the plaintiffs argue the Affordable Care Act only allows for tax credit subsidies via state-run exchanges or only those, as the ACA states, "established by the state." If the court rules in favor of the plaintiff an estimated 5 to 8 million newly insured will lose their coverage absent a subsidy because to date only 16 states plus the District of Columbia have set up state health insurance exchanges or marketplaces. If this is the Court's ruling how might the Republican-controlled Congress react? Regardless of the Court's decision the health care reform likely becomes a 2016 presidential campaign issue for the Republican party.